Dixon v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at thirty-eight years’ confinement. In three issues, appellant contends (1) the evidence is factually insufficient to support the jury’s verdict, (2) the trial court erred in admitting the expert testimony of a police officer, and (3) the trial court erred in admitting testimonial hearsay during the punishment phase of his trial. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant and Priscilla Smith (“Complainant”) became acquainted and started…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Felix Amador v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Ex Parte Patricia Foster Skelton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Tony Brewer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
- Martin Eduardo Villanueva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.