Legal Opinion
Claudio Arce v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2018No. 16-56706PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAUDIO ANAYA ARCE, No. 16-56706 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cv-02419- PSG-MRW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2018 Pasadena, California Filed August 9, 2018 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion 2 ANAYA ARCE V. UNITED STATES SUMMARY * Immigration The panel reversed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Kong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- Ragbir v. HomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Balogun v. SessionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Probodanu v. SessionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- M.M.M. ex rel. J.M.A. v. SessionsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.