Probodanu v. Sessions
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
The eleven named Petitioners are Indonesian nationals and citizens seeking to challenge the Government's authority to detain and remove them and other supposedly similarly situated individuals. Petitioners assert eight counts, six of which are brought on behalf of four putative classes. (Dkt. 30 [Operative First Amended Complaint, hereinafter "FAC"].) They generally allege that the Government cannot detain or remove noncitizens subject to a final order of removal where the noncitizen has applied for or requested, or might apply for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- KARR v. Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Ramirez Medina v. AsherDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019