Jenkins v. . Griffith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The corporate defendant was created by chapter 383, Public-Local Laws 1921, and vested with certain duties and powers which hitherto had been exercised by the Board of Commissioners of Mecklenburg County. This defendant exercises only governmental functions — builds, maintains and controls public roads in Mecklenburg County, wbicb are not a part of the State system, and has charge of the county convicts, as provided by its charter above cited.
Neither phase of the duties of this defendant exceeds the limits of purely governmental functions. Hence, this action cannot be maintained against the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- County Commissioners v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Murdock Parlor Grate Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- White v. Commissioners of ChowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Moody v. State Prison.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'berry, State Treasurer v. . Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Latham v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hyder v. Board of County Road Trustees for Henderson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Lowman v. . ComrsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Reeves v. Asheville Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.