Latham v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbis case was before us at a former term (185 N. C., 134), on plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment sustaining a general demurrer interposed by tbe defendants and wbicb was reversed because of tbe presence of tbe individual defendant and tbe broad allegations of tbe complaint. Hipp v. Ferrell, 169 N. C., 551, S. c., 173 N. C., 167. Doubtless tbe demurrer should bave been sustained as to tbe other defendants, especially tbe State Highway Commission. Carpenter v. R. R., 184 N. C., 400. But however tbis may be, in view of tbe evidence offered on tbe bearing, we bave experienced no difficulty in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carpenter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Durham v. Rigsbee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Moody v. State Prison.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Rouse v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- McIntire v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schloss v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Yancey v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reed v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Williams v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.