Legal Opinion

Hyder v. Board of County Road Trustees for Henderson County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The judgment sustaining the demurrers must be affirmed on authority of Jenkins v. Griffith, 189 N. C., 633, and Hipp v. Fenrall, 173 N. C., 167.

Jenkins v. Griffith was written under a per curiam opinion, but this in no way impairs its force as a precedent. It is supported by full citation of authorities. Ordinarily, a per curiam is the opinion of the Court in a case in which we are all of one mind, and where the questions presented are controlled by previous decisions, or otherwise they are of such a nature that we do not deem it necessary, or beneficial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hipp v. FerrallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Minor v. FikeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Jenkins v. . GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Latham v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Lowman v. . ComrsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Mote v. White Lake Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Betts v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API