Legal Opinion

Seide v. Committee of Bar Examiners

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1989No. S009069PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner George N. Seide challenges the decision of the Review Department of the State Bar Court refusing to certify him for admission to the bar on the ground that he lacks good moral character. We agree with the review department and decline to admit petitioner to practice.

I. Background

In February 1987, the State Bar informed petitioner he had passed the California Bar examination, but would not be certified to practice law pending an investigation into his moral character. A three-member panel held four days of hearings between October 1987 and January 1988, and found…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re NadrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kwasnik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re MennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re KingArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re GossageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re WiesnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API