Legal Opinion

In Re King

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2006No. SB-03-0152-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.*

¶ 1 This court recently denied the application to practice law submitted by an individual previously convicted of first-degree murder. In re Hamm, 211 Ariz. 458, 123 P.3d 652 (2005). In the wake of Hamm, we review the recommendation of this court’s Committee on Character and Fitness to admit Lee Keller King, who was previously convicted of attempted murder. Because King has failed to satisfy his burden to demonstrate his character and fitness to practice law in Arizona, we reject the Committee’s recommendation and deny King’s application.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 1977,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. In Re the Reinstatement of a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, RobbinsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re HammArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re BeersOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Seide v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Richard B. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re LazcanoArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re NashSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. In Re KingArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re NashSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API