Legal Opinion

In re Wiesner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*168OPINION OF THE COURT

Tom, J.

Petitioner, a twice-convicted felon, submitted his tenth renewed application to the Committee on Character and Fitness for admission to the bar. The unusual and lengthy history of petitioner’s efforts to gain admission to the New York bar has been affected by differing views of whether petitioner has the moral character and fitness to practice law. The impediment to approval has been the serious crimes committed by petitioner years ago. In prior applications, we judged the passage of time to be insufficient to evaluate the success and sincerity of his rehabilitation.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. In Re CasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. In re PragerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ISB v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In re AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API