Legal Opinion

City of San Buenaventura v. Allianz Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1992No. B060381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Police from the City of San Buenaventura (City) arrest the driver of a van for driving under the influence. The police call the van’s owner, who authorizes the passenger to take the van. The police release the van to the passenger who drives away and gets in an accident, injuring a third party. The victim sues the City, claiming the police were negligent in allowing the passenger to drive the van.

Is the City covered under the van owner’s insurance policy? No. We affirm the trial court’s decision that the City is not covered and that neither the “permissive use” provision nor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ohio Farmers Indemnity Co. v. Interinsurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. QuinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. American States Insurance v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Showa Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Scottsdale Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. (HC) Herrera v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API