American States Insurance v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Liability insurance policies for commercial motor vehicles typically include an “omnibus clause.” As pertinent here, that clause defines as an “insured” one who is vicariously liable for the conduct of a named insured or a permissive user in using or operating the covered vehicle.
In this appeal, we conclude that such an “omnibus clause” may make a person or entity that is potentially vicariously liable under the peculiar risk doctrine an “insured,” and thereby entitled to a defense pursuant to the insurance policy. Under the peculiar risk doctrine, one may be held vicari ously…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tidwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Financial Pacific Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jaynes Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Premier Pools Mgmt. Corp. v. Colony Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Baek v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Carlson v. Century Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.