Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harris v. Hanson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1908No. 15,511PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dodge county: Jame? Gf. Reeder, Judge. The following opinion on rehearing was filed July 17, 1908. Former judgment of affirmance adhered to:

1Opinion of the Court

Epperson, C.

This action is one in the nature of quo warranto to determine whether or not the Farmland, Fremont & Railway Drainage District, of which the defendants are, or purport to he, the officers, is a legally existing corporation. The district was organized under the provisions of an act of our last legislature, published as chapter 153, laws 1907. The constitutionality of this act is questioned. It is in part as follows:

“Section 1. Whenever it will be conducive to the public health, convenience or Avelfare either to drain any wet land, or to drain any land subject to overflow by water,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. People ex rel. Van Loben Sels v. Reclamation District No. 551California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Board of Directors v. CollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Wittler v. BaumgartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. The Ozark Corp. v. PattishallSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Johnson v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Vertrees v. State Board of ElectionsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API