Legal Opinion
People v. Bellamy
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 1926No. Docket No. 889PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEEDHAM, J., pro tem.
The defendant was charged by an indictment of the grand jury of the county of Sacramento with the crime of pimping, as defined by the Statutes of 1911, page 10, which reads as follows:
“Section 1. Any male person who, knowing a female person to be a prostitute, shall live or derive support or maintenance, in whole or in part, from the earnings or proceeds of the prostitution of such prostitute, or from moneys loaned or advanced to or charged against such prostitute by any keeper or manager or inmate of a house or other place where prostitution is practiced or allowed, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. CockrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. WilhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Ex Parte ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. O'MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.