Legal Opinion

State v. Dunn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1939No. 6672PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J. —

Appellant was convicted of obtaining money by false pretenses under an indictment which charged the receipt and transmittal by appellant as agent for J. B. Stan-field, Inc., of Portland, of a contract for the sale of wool by one Carson to the company; it being alleged the contract was false and fictitious and that upon such contract appellant received $200 from the company.

Appellant contends it was prejudicial error to permit an amendment of the indictment changing it by alleging that appellant, as agent of said J. B. Stanfield Co. “received” the contract whereas the original…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ConnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. GuthrieWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PolsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. McCallumIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. KombolIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API