Legal Opinion

People v. Anthony

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1912No. Crim. No. 410PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

In this case the defendant was indicted by the grand jury of the city and county of San Francisco for the commission of the felony defined in section 288 of the Penal Code, which provides that “Any person who shall willfully and lewdly commit any lewd or lascivious act other than the acts constituting other crimes provided for in part II of this code, upon or with the body, or any part or member thereof, of a child under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust or passions or sexual desires of such person or of such child, shall be guilty of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. OliveriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. FiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. LuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. LachukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API