Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Chambers

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1917No. Crim. No. 384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

In the return to this application for a writ of habeas corpus appear three warrants of arrest in proper form which it is claimed by the sheriff of San Joaquin County justify his detention of petitioner. The first two were issued by a justice of the peace, based upon verified complaints charging two separate offenses of perjury, and the third is a bench warrant upon an indictment, also for perjury, found by the grand jury of said county.

As to the warrants issued by the said justice, the contention of petitioner is as follows: “No preliminary examination has been held upon either charge,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Ex Parte HayterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. Du BoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. BellamyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API