United States v. George Darden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
George Darden received a career offender enhancement under United States Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.1. At issue is whether one of Darden’s previous convictions qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the residual clause of § 4B1.2(a)(2). See Appellee’s Br. 7. In Johnson v. United States, No. 13-7120, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, - L.Ed.2d -, 2015 WL 2473450 (U.S. June 26, 2015) (slip op. at 10, 15), the Supreme Court held that the identically worded residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is void for vagueness. Compare U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2) with 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). We…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- William T. Houston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Travis Beckles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
4Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Chad TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Nathaniel OzierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. WilloughbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Petrillo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.