Legal Opinion
Petrillo v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 25, 2015No. Civil No. 3:08-cv-1204 (JBA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PETITIONER’S AMENDED MOTION UNDER § 2255
Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge.
On January 20, 2015, this Court denied Petitioner Lucian Petrillo’s Motion [Doc. #32] to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the grounds that Mr. Petrillo had waived his right to collaterally attack his sentence in *12his Plea Agreement. . (Order Denying § 2255 Pet. [Doc. # 47] at 1.) On March 18, 2015, the parties jointly moved for reconsideration of that ruling, as the Government “no longer [sought] to enforce the collateral attack[ ] waiver” as to claims of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Villanueva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Chambers v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- HARTZELL v. ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Lucas v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.