Legal Opinion

William T. Houston v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1999No. 98-5734PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILER, Circuit Judge.

William T. Houston was sentenced under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), after his conviction under § 922(g) for being a felon in possession of a firearm. His sentence was enhanced on the basis of three predicate violent felonies under the ACCA: felonious assault, escape, and murder. He appeals the use of his conviction for escape as a predicate violent felony under the ACCA. We affirm.

The sole legal issue is whether Houston’s 1966 conviction for escape can be used as a predicate “violent felony” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). That statute provides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Robert Gardford Hairston, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Billy Ross MoudyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Rodney T. HowzeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Donald T. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Michael Leon BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Patrick JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API