Legal Opinion

United States v. Chad Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2015No. 14-2635PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

Chad Taylor pled guilty to possessing a prohibited object in prison in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2). Taylor received a sentencing enhancement for committing a “crime of violence” under the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(a). On appeal, Taylor argues that his sentence is unlawful because the language in the guideline is unconstitutionally vague. We held this appeal in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s anticipated decision in Johnson v. United States.

In Johnson, the Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutionally vague. 576…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Allon AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. George DardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. MadridCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Jesse PawlakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Jimmy TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Tony HurlburtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Soto-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API