Hammond Lumber Co. v. Bloodgood
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
On April 16, 1927, appellant filed its action against defendants, seeking to foreclose a materialman’s lien. Respondent was named as contractor and personal judgment was sought against him. The summons is not in the record, but respondent admits personal service in the county of Riverside. On October 21, 1927, the default of respondent was entered, and on December 3, 1927, a default judgment was rendered and entered against him. No judgment was taken foreclosing the lien. On December 8, 1927, respondent served and filed his notice of motion to set aside the judgment, on the grounds of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Brasher v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Walberg v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Fink & Schindler Co. v. GavrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kallman v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Padilla v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Anderson v. City Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.