Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1996No. F023939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, J.
Elvira Padilla contends the superior court was under statutory mandate to transfer her petition for writ of administrative mandamus to this court, and erred in dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We agree. However, deeming the petition transferred as one requesting review, we exercise our discretion to deny the petition.
Facts and Proceedings
Appellant owned a bar near Bakersfield. On September 17, 1993, two undercover investigators from respondent Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) went into the bar and ordered beer. The beers were $3 each.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Berkeley v. CukiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. BloodgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Trafficschoolonline, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Trafficschoolonline, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Trafficschoolonline, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.