Brasher v. White
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant having failed to answer or demur to the plaintiff’s complaint herein within due legal time, a default therefor and thereupon a judgment were entered against him.
It appears that the default of the defendant for his failure to answer or demur to the complaint and judgment upon such default were entered against, him upon the thirteenth day of September, 1920; that the defendant first received information of the default and the judgment having been entered on the twenty-fourth day of September, 1920, and that, on the twenty-seventh day of September, 1920—three days after the receipt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Jergins v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brooks v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Brown v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Toon v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Bonfilio v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Weck v. SucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.