Legal Opinion
Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1992No. CV-91-0300-APPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUTH V. McGREGOR, Court of Appeals Judge.
Plaintiff Perini Land and Development Company (Perini) appeals from the trial court’s order directing the Pima County Board of Supervisors to place a referendum proposed by intervenor Sabino Canyon Coalition, Inc. (the Coalition) on the ballot in the next Pima County election. Perini also challenges the trial court’s order enjoining Perini’s development plans near Sabino Canyon, Arizona. We hold the Coalition’s referendum petition did not strictly comply with constitutional requirements and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.
I
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Direct Sellers Association v. McBrayerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Ward v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Committee for Preservation of Established Neighborhoods v. RiffelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.