Meagher v. Maleki
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*3Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
The law in California has long been that an annulment of marriage may be granted on the basis of fraud only “in an extreme case where the particular fraud goes to the very essence of the marriage relation.” (Marshall v. Marshall (1931) 212 Cal. 736, 739-740 [300 P. 816]; accord, Barnes v. Barnes (1895) 110 Cal. 418, 421-422 [42 P. 904].) Based on that settled rule, in this case we reverse a judgment granting an annulment to a wife whose husband, prior to the marriage, misrepresented his financial status and fraudulently induced her to invest in a business venture with him,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turfe v. Turfe (In re Turfe), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Daniel Alvarez v. Los Angeles CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Mario Phuong Todorov, V. Hanh Phuong HaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Marriage of Weiss CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Miller v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.