Legal Opinion
Kingston v. Brussat
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 9, 1988No. 87-C-1610PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Retha Kingston (“Kingston”) commenced this action to recover on a promissory note. Defendant Thomas Brus-sat (“Brussat”) has moved to quash service of process or alternatively to change venue.
These facts appear to be undisputed: Brussat is a resident of Oregon and service was obtained on him in Oregon. On February 1, 1977, Brussat and his wife Marcia (now deceased) executed a promissory note in Oregon, payable at Denver, Colorado, to Kingston and her husband Don (now deceased) for the sum of ten thousand dollars. No payments were made on the note.
Brussat…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Van Schaack & Co. v. District Court, Eighteenth JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Ruggieri v. General Well Service, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Panos Investment Co. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Tucker v. Vista Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sender v. PowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Plus System, Inc. v. New England Network, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Rocky Mountain Claim Staking v. FrandsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Alameda National Bank v. KanchanapoomDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Custom Vinyl Compounding, Inc. v. Bushart & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.