Legal Opinion

United States v. Frage

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 12, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before us as a government appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862. The issue presented is whether the military judge below was correct in dismissing all charges against the accused as being barred by the statute of limitations because the charges were never properly sworn to before an officer authorized to administer oaths.

The accused was charged with desertion terminated by apprehension, larceny of over $100 worth of food, and the unauthorized sale of the same food. The larcenies were alleged to have occurred between October 1982 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. AutreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. KoepkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frage v. MoriartyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. Frage v. EdingtonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API