Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Foerst

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1932No. Docket No. 8593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEARY, J., pro tem.

Action by plaintiff for a decree establishing a lien for street work in the sum of $1,021.44 and interest, performed pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 4720, New Series (1918), upon the property of defendant in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

There is no dispute about the facts; upon the trial appellant conceded respondent had proved a prima facie case, and stipulated that' all of the allegations of the complaint were true. Appellant relies upon an affirmative defense…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanley v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Marculescu v. City Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Hanley v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API