Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1953No. S. F. 18674, 18675; S. F. 18676PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

These appeals are from judgments ordering the issuance of writs of mandate requiring the restoration of the two petitioners to their respective former positions of superintendent of jail under the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, and the payment to them of the salary fixed for those positions in lieu of the compensation received by them following their demotion. The cases were tried concurrently before the same trial judge and are presented together on these appeals.

The trial court found that the removal of petitioners from their former positions did not conform with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Neff v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Neuwald v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jones v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Acton v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Sonoma County Board of Education v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API