Legal Opinion
Bundy Tubing Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Royal Indemnity Company, a New York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1962No. 14490_1PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
Bundy Tubing Company was the manufacturer of small thin walled steel tubing used by building contractors and plumbers as material for radiant heating. The tubing was to be installed in concrete floors of basementless houses or buildings. Hot water from the boiler was carried through the tubing in the floors thereby heating the buildings. Royal Indemnity Company had issued to Bundy in Detroit, Michigan two policies of liability insurance which included “Products Hazard” coverage.
Three lawsuits were filed against Bundy in California and five in Michigan *152seeking recovery for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Volf v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. Of Wisconsin v. HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Massachusetts Bond. & Ins. Co. v. Orkin Exterm. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Moore & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. James McGowan Individually and D/B/A Jmac Enterprises, and Lori L. DuttonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.