Legal Opinion

Volf v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1958No. Sac. 6890PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*374TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff Edward J. Volf, a general contractor, constructed a stucco house in San Andreas for A. P. Hoover. A stucco exterior finish for a house consists of three coats: a “scratch” coat, which is a mixture of sand, cement and water applied % inch to % inch thick; a “brown” coat, which is a similar mixture of the same thickness; and a “color” or “finish” coat, which is like a paint wash applied with a trowel about % inch thick. The “scratch” coat went on without incident. The “brown” coat would not stick to the “scratch” coat so Volf returned the mixture to the Neilsen Company for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Heyward v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1955

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Haugan v. Home Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sola Basic Industries, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API