Legal Opinion

People v. Fox

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1958No. Crim. 2796PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By an indictment Frederick M. Fox and his wife, Susan, were charged in Count I thereof with the crime of violating section 523 of the Penal Code, sending a threatening letter with the intent to extort money from one John Graffigna by threatening to expose him to disgrace and threat ening the exposure of secrets affecting him. In Count II of the indictment Frederick alone was charged with a violation of section 217 of the Penal Code in that he assaulted Graffigna with the intent to commit murder. A motion to set aside the indictment on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence, as well as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. T. Wah HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. RenierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. ChuidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Cross v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. SaldanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. UmanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. OppenheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API