Legal Opinion

People v. Choynski

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1892No. 20756PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The appellant was convicted of a felony, to wit, sending a threatening letter with intent to-extort money, and now prosecutes an appeal to this court from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The prosecution is based upon section 523 of the Penal Code, which reads as follows: “'Every person who, with intent to extort any money or other property from another, sends or delivers to any person any letter or other writing, whether subscribed or not, expressing or implying, or adapted to imply, any threat such as is specified in section 519, is punishable,” etc. The letter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Morrill v. NightingaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. Van EwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In re SHERINSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Schultz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. WoodcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API