Legal Opinion

People v. Umana

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2006No. C047790PublishedCited by 12 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

Defendants Jessica Langshaw and Raul Umana attempted to extort money and property from a number of men with whom Langshaw had maintained brief sexual relations. They were convicted of multiple counts of attempted extortion (Pen. Code, § 524; further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code), and delivering a threatening writing with intent to extort (§ 523). Langshaw was also convicted of three counts of falsely reporting a crime. (§ 148.5, subd. (a).) Langshaw was sentenced to state prison for seven years eight months and was ordered to pay restitution of $1,600…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cross v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Malin v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. BollaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. Kaufman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API