Legal Opinion

People v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1933No. Docket No. 2300PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

Upon an indictment charging attempts to commit extortion, the appellant was found guilty by a jury. He moved for a new trial, which was denied, and thereupon appealed from the judgment and from the orders entered upon said motions. ■

In one count of the indictment it was alleged that in violation of sections 518, 519 and 524 of the Penal Code, the defendant attempted to extort property from a judge of the superior court by a threat that he would publish and cause to be printed in a newspaper a statement falsely exposing said judge to disgrace and imputing disgrace to him, unless the latter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Rich v. JochimMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Moore v. StricklingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gray v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. AstaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. FranquelinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. NorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API