Legal Opinion

People v. Oppenheimer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1962No. Crim. 8044PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order setting aside an indictment following a motion made by the defendant under the provisions of section 995, Penal Code. The defendant filed a cross-appeal from the order of the court “insofar as it limits the dismissal of the case to the provisions of section 995. -. . .”

In an indictment filed in Los Angeles County on July 19, 1961, the appellant was charged in four counts with violating the provisions of section 523 of the Penal Code. 1

The first count of the indictment set forth that the defendant did on January 27, 1961, “. . . feloniously,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. CamodecaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. De Mond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bush v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. AstaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Kohn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. State v. MENDOZA-TAPIACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API