Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Pan American Southern Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 27, 1964No. 5-3241PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul AVakd, Associate Justice.

The principal question involved in this appeal relates to the liability of a sheriff for failing to make a statutory return on an execution. Most of the facts involved are not in dispute. The ones presently set out are not questioned.

Facts. In 1956 appellee, Pan American Southern Corporation, secured a judgment in the Pulaski County Circuit Court against one R. AN. Coyle in the sum of $2,782.42. The judgment not having been paid, appellee’s attorneys had an execution issued by the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk against Coyle, directed to the sheriff of Prairie…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fiser v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Smith v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. State v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Thompson v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Simms, Billups & Co. v. QuinnMississippi Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kenneth Daniel Haynes, Jr. And Alma Jane Haynes v. American Motors Corporation and Jeep CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Harding v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Mini-Art Operating Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Southern Credit Corp. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Vinson Electric Supply, Inc. v. PoteeteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API