Legal Opinion

Strong v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2007No. C052818PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

The State Board of Equalization has promulgated a rule that grants to registered domestic partners certain property tax relief afforded to spouses. County assessors unsuccessfully challenged the rule in the trial court and now appeal, arguing that it is unconstitutional. We disagree.

In 1978, voters adopted Proposition 13, a constitutional amendment, which limits the amount of ad valorem tax assessed on real property unless there has been a “change in ownership.” After the Legislature defined such a change of ownership to exclude, among other things, real property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hodges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Board of Supervisors v. LonerganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. 926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Citizens Ass'n v. Orange County Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. California Bank & Trust v. Piedmont Operating PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API