Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1980No. L.A. 31244PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208 [149 Cal.Rptr. 239, 583 P.2d 1281] (hereinafter Amador), we upheld the validity of article XIII A of the California Constitution against multiple constitutional challenges. Adopted in June 1978 as an initiative measure designated and popularly known as Proposition 13, article XIII A significantly altered the system of real property taxation in this state.

In considering the substantial attacks mounted against the measure, we restricted our inquiry to the “principal, fundamental…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API