Legal Opinion

California Bank & Trust v. Piedmont Operating Partnership

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 2013No. G047122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

“In 1989, Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, which is often referred to by the acronym FIRREA, and is codified at title 12 United States Code section 1821(d) . . . .” (Neman v. Commercial Capital Bank (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 645, 648 [92 Cal.Rptr.3d 800].) FIRREA “was designed to provide for takeovers of failed federally insured banking institutions” and “to provide a smooth mechanism for the rehabilitation” of such institutions and for the disposal of claims against them. (Neman, at p. 648.) “. . . FIRREA is a public…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Unisys Finance Corporation v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Concordia Federal Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Valerio v. Andrew Youngquist ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sciarratta v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Legendary Investors Group No. 1, LLC v. NiemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In re: Allana BaroniUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Rreef America Reit II Corp, YYYY v. Samsara, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API