Legal Opinion

926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2017No. S222329PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

*324 Here we consider whether the County of Los Angeles can impose a documentary transfer tax on a written instrument that transfers beneficial ownership of real property from one person to two others. We hold that the tax may be imposed if the document reflects a sale: that is, an actual transfer of legal beneficial ownership made for consideration.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A. Transactions Involving the Building

This case arises from a series of transactions among trusts maintained for the benefit of Averbook family members. Beryl and Gloria Averbook owned *325 an apartment building at 926 North Ardmore…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Alford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Edison California Stores, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Moorer v. Noble L.A. Events, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. AdelmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API