Legal Opinion
State v. Combs
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1999No. AC 17666PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*701 Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after he entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, to charges of possession of narcotics and sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-279a and 21a-277 (a). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress certain evidence. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Because the defendant has not provided us with an adequate record for review, we decline to review his claims. The duty to provide this court with a record…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Alix v. LeechConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Emigrant Savings Bank v. EricksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
4Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Lombardi v. LombardiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Muros North Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Amo v. PincinceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999