Legal Opinion
Eisenschenk v. Millers' Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1984No. C5-83-2065PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action to determine whether appellant is entitled to receive underinsured motorist benefits under an insurance policy issued to his father after appellant has received the full liability limits under that policy as a result of a one-car accident. Appellant Millers’ Mutual Insurance Association of Illinois (Millers’) appeals from the trial court’s finding that underinsured motorist coverage was available to plaintiff. We reverse.
FACTS
Plaintiff-respondent Thomas A. Eisen-schenk was injured in a one-car accident. He was a passenger in a car…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hauer v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Glaser v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Linder Ex Rel. Linder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Thomas v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.