Legal Opinion

Glaser v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1956No. 36,776PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff brought an action against John G. Alexander; Transcontinental Insurance Corporation; and Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd., as defendants, to reform an insurance policy against sprinkler leakage issued by Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd., on May 28, 1951, in the amount of $7,000 for a term of 3 years. He alleged that said policy had been issued contrary to his directions for annual automatic renewal of separate sprinkler leakage and fire insurance policies ; that he was without the required protection of fire insurance at a time when he suffered damages by fire; and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Wall v. MeilkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Mahoney v. Minnesota Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Boyle General Tire Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API