Legal Opinion

Schrank v. Pennington County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] In this appeal we affirm the circuit court’s reversal of the county’s granting of a conditional use permit to a drilling company.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Alexander Drilling and Garry Schrank are neighbors in an area of Hill City zoned “Highway Service” under the Pennington County Zoning Ordinance. Schrank operates a campground. Alexander, who owns a fourteen-acre parcel of land, operates a drilling service and makes some retail sales of water pumps and pressure tanks. In 1996, Pennington County determined Alexander’s use of the property was in technical…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Dunker v. Brown County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gul v. Center for Family MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Elliott v. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API