Legal Opinion

State v. Frey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1989No. 16034PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice (on reassignment).

This is a criminal action in which appellant Dean Frey appeals his conviction on two counts of aggravated assault. In affirming the conviction, we hold (1) that appellant was not entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser offense of simple assault; (2) that appellant’s issue regarding the variance between the charging language of the indictment and the jury instruction was not properly preserved for appeal; (3) that the trial court did not err in not submitting a trespass (by law enforcement officers) issue to the jury; and (4) that appellant was not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KnocheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KlaudtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dean Frey v. Walter Leapley, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Roger Tellinghuisen, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. BlackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. OttoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API