Legal Opinion

State v. Otto

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1995No. 18811PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

William D. Otto (“Otto”) appeals his conviction of first-degree burglary on the basis of alleged errors in instructing the jury. We affirm.

FACTS

While driving in a rural area on the night of December 14, 1993, Otto and Brian L. Leingang (“Leingang”) became lost. They stopped at a farm house where they knocked on the door. When no one answered, the two walked around the house, stopping at each door and window. They gained access to the attached garage through an outside door. Leingang then proceeded to the door leading from the garage into the house. In his attempt to open the door, Leingang…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. OsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. KnocheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. StetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pollini v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SatterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lacey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. State v. MesaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LaduSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API