Legal Opinion

Hill v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Civil action to recover damages for alleged wrongs committed by the defendants in connection with the sale of an automobile to the plaintiff. After the jury was empaneled and the pleadings were read, the court upon inquiry was informed by the plaintiff’s attorney that the action “is -brought for rescission” of the conditional sale contract. Thereupon counsel for the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was allowed and the action was dismissed. The question for decision is whether this ruling was correct.

“A motion for judgment on the pleadings is in the nature of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. White Sewing MacHine Co. v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Don Allen Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hajoca Corporation v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Lane v. GriswoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Craven v. DimmetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API