Lane v. Griswold
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.
Defendants filed a demurrer to the complaint, and made a motion for judgment on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings by defendants is tantamount to a demurrer on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Woodruff v. Insurance Co., 260 N.C. 723, 133 S.E. 2d 704; Fisher v. Motor Co., 249 N.C. 617, 107 S.E. 2d 94; Hill v. Parker, 248 N.C. 662, 104 S.E. 2d 848; 3 Strong, N. C. Index, Pleadings, § 30, and Supplement to ibid; 71 C.J.S., Pleading, § 425(b). In Erickson v. Starling, 235 N.C. 643, 71 S.E. 2d 384, Ervin, J., said for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. SteubnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- Boehnen v. Walston & Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
- Bynum v. Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Iti Commc'ns, LLC v. Seamon, Whiteside, & Assocs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2025
- Mauney v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985