Legal Opinion

Lane v. Griswold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1968No. Case 446; Case 442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Defendants filed a demurrer to the complaint, and made a motion for judgment on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings by defendants is tantamount to a demurrer on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Woodruff v. Insurance Co., 260 N.C. 723, 133 S.E. 2d 704; Fisher v. Motor Co., 249 N.C. 617, 107 S.E. 2d 94; Hill v. Parker, 248 N.C. 662, 104 S.E. 2d 848; 3 Strong, N. C. Index, Pleadings, § 30, and Supplement to ibid; 71 C.J.S., Pleading, § 425(b). In Erickson v. Starling, 235 N.C. 643, 71 S.E. 2d 384, Ervin, J., said for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. SteubnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
  2. Boehnen v. Walston & Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
  3. Bynum v. Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Iti Commc'ns, LLC v. Seamon, Whiteside, & Assocs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2025
  5. Mauney v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API