Hajoca Corporation v. Brooks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
It appears from the record and briefs that the trial was conducted by Judge Craven, without a jury, as a “small claims action,” for which provision is made by Oh. 1337, Session Laws of 1955. When made applicable to a particular county by appropriate resolution of its board of county commissioners, the right to jury trial in such county may be waived as provided in said statute. To this extent, said statute supplements G.S. 1-184. Construing these statutes in pari materia, it is clear that the provisions of G.S. 1-185, G.S. 1-186 and G.S. 1-187, relating to proceedings upon waiver of jury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Robinson v. . HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Manufacturing Co. v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Hendrix v. B & L Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- O'Shea v. HatchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Davis v. Vintage Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Lilley v. Manning Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Design Plus Store Fixtures, Inc. v. Citro Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.